Script review: Animal House (May 5, 1978)

By Greg Raven

When I heard that Arne Sultan, producer of Get Smart, was thinking about bringing back the series, I wrote him a letter offering to be one of his writers. He invited me to his office on the Universal Studios lot for a discussion.

Once there, he was vague about rebooting the series, but I got to talk with him and meet his office-mate, Bill Dana (most famous for his character José Jiménez).

As I was leaving the meeting, Arne handed me a script and asked that I let him know what I thought about it. That script was for the upcoming Animal House movie.

If you’re wondering why I never worked on any projects with Arne, here’s the review I sent him.

TITLE: ANIMAL HOUSE   FORM: THIRD DRAFT SCREENPLAY
AUTHOR: RAMIS, KENNEY, AND MILLER   LENGTH: 141 PAGES
SUBMITTED TO: GREG RAVEN   TYPE: COLLEGE COMEDY
READ BY: GREG RAVEN   LOCATION: EASTERN U.S.
DATE: May 5, 1978   PERIOD: 1962

SHORT SYNOPSIS:

Two college freshmen, KENT DORFMAN and LARRY KROGER, are rejected by every fraternity at EBERHARD-FABER COLLEGE but one, and DELTA HOUSE only accepts them because Kent’s older brother used to be a pledge there. Delta, however, proves to be the worst house on campus. Under the influence of their Brothers, their grades and moral gradually deteriorate, and the two become involved in several misadventures which eventually result in their expulsion, and the revocation of the Delta House charter. With their Brothers, they come up with a plan to “get even” with the college and the other frat houses, and go out in style.

SYNOPSIS:

Freshmen KENT DORFMAN and LARRY KROGER together rush every fraternity at EBERHARD-FABER COLLEGE with hopes of being pledged. They are less-than-desirable material, however (nerds, to be exact), and are turned down by every frat house but one: DELTA HOUSE, the worst on campus. On the strength of the fact that Kent’s brother was once a Delta pledge, the two are accepted, and are given the nicknames of FLOUNDER and PINTO, respectively, by their new Brothers, BLUTO, MOUNTAIN, HOOVER, TUBE, OTTER, BOON, D-DAY, HOSS, STORK, and MOTHBALL.

Not only is Delta the worst house on campus, but it has among its adversaries DEAN WORMER, who has put the house on “double secret probation.” Flounder, meanwhile, runs afoul of GREGG MARMALARD, a BMOC, who makes life miserable for the freshman. Encouraged by his Brothers, Flounder attempts to “get even” with Gregg, but the plan backfires when he and his cohorts kill Gregg’s ROTC horse by accident. They aren’t caught, but are suspected, and it is another black mark against the house.

In a meeting at the house after finals, it is realized that everyone at Delta has done rather poorly, and it is decided that the annual Delta House. Toga Party will help cheer them up. As usual, the party gets a little out of hand, and Otter winds up with Dean Wormer’s wife, MARION, while Pinto manages to get caught in a compromising positon with the mayor’s daughter, CLORETTE. As a result, the house is hauled before the Disciplinary Board, and the house charter is revoked.

In a devil-may-care moment, Otter and Boon take the Lincoln that Flounder borrowed from his brother for the Toga Party, and go for a joy ride that demolishes the car.

When the finals’ scores come in, the members of Delta House are expelled for low grades by a triumphant Dean Wormer. At the same time, womanizing Otter is lured into a trap by a jealous Gregg, and beat senseless by a gang of Beta House thugs. In keeping with the “get even” philosophy, the Delta Brothers decide that they should stage one last gesture against the status quo; the total destruction of the Homecoming Parade.

COMMENT:

The idea of a college comedy set in the good old days is certainly not a new one, but with the current nostalgia craze, it could prove popular. The actual mechanics of the script, however, are cumbersome. The personalities, while necessarily exaggerated, somehow come off as bland, and there are several instances in which cliches are thrown out shamelessly, with the expectation that they will justify the actions taking place on screen. For the most part, the visual gags and many of the situational gags are of the type that one would expect to see in a Disney movie, but the amount of sex precludes this type of treatment. Also, the bizarre handling of the destructiqp scene at the end is inconsistent with the tone set at the beginning of the movie. All in all, while the movie stays away from being embarrassingly stupid, it suffers from the lack of a strong premise.